Posted: 13 Sep 2009 08:38 PM PDT Stephen Mihm at the Boston Globe looks at Hyman Minsky: Why capitalism fails
Amid the hand-wringing … a few … commentators started to speak about the arrival of a “Minsky moment,” … shorthand for Hyman Minsky, a hitherto obscure macroeconomist who died over a decade ago.
In recent months Minsky’s star has only risen. Nobel Prize-winning economists talk about incorporating his insights, and copies of his books are back in print and selling well. He’s gone from being a nearly forgotten figure to a key player in the debate over how to fix the financial system.
Posted: 13 Sep 2009 08:38 PM PDT
Stephen Mihm at the Boston Globe looks at Hyman Minsky: Why capitalism fails
But if Minsky was as right as he seems to have been, the news is not exactly encouraging. He believed in capitalism, but also believed it had almost a genetic weakness. Modern finance, he argued, was far from the stabilizing force that mainstream economics portrayed: rather, it was a system that created the illusion of stability while simultaneously creating the conditions for an inevitable and dramatic collapse.
In other words, the one person who foresaw the crisis also believed that our whole financial system contains the seeds of its own destruction. “Instability,” he wrote, “is an inherent and inescapable flaw of capitalism.”
Minsky’s vision might have been dark, but he was not a fatalist; he believed it was possible to craft policies that could blunt the collateral damage caused by financial crises. But with a growing number of economists eager to declare the recession over, and the crisis itself apparently behind us, these policies may prove as discomforting as the theories that prompted them in the first place. Indeed, as economists re-embrace Minsky’s prophetic insights, it is far from clear that they’re ready to reckon with the full implications of what he saw.
An interesting overview of Minsky. And this sure sounds like the recent credit bubble:
As people forget that failure is a possibility, a “euphoric economy” eventually develops, fueled by the rise of far riskier borrowers – what [Minsky] called speculative borrowers, those whose income would cover interest payments but not the principal; and those he called “Ponzi borrowers,” those whose income could cover neither, and could only pay their bills by borrowing still further. As these latter categories grew, the overall economy would shift from a conservative but profitable environment to a much more freewheeling system dominated by players whose survival depended not on sound business plans, but on borrowed money and freely available credit.
And since the failure of many economists to see the coming crisis is being widely discussed, here is a quote from Minsky on macroeconomics:
“There is nothing wrong with macroeconomics that another depression [won’t] cure."