JP Morgan Eye on the Market: Nothing Else Matters

Eye on the Market, February 21, 2012 (the attached PDF is easier to read.  Microsoft Outlook does not do a great job with our charts)

Nothing else matters” (Metallica, 1991)

As far as markets are concerned, I don’t think anything has mattered this year other than the 2 charts below.  The first shows the rise in select central bank balance sheets and the second shows why central bankers feel safe doing it: low inflation.  The goals: generate positive inflation in regions beset by deflation (Japan); boost bank capital and avoid insolvency by unlimited lending against a liberal definition of collateral (Europe); provide a lifeline to households, and pull forward future demand for consumer durables (US, UK); finance governments so markets don’t have to do as much (everywhere); encourage investor risk-taking by devaluing cash savings (also everywhere); then wait for private sector to recover.  The caveat: stop if there are signs of inflation.  As shown in the second chart, inflation looks pretty tame (also see OECD output gap, p.2), although like the disclaimer says, “past performance is not indicative of future results”.  On commodity prices, central bankers see them as mean-reverting, and generally disavow connections between monetary stimulus and demand-based commodity price increases.

Like obscenity and modern art, these charts mean different things to different people.  Larry Fink at BlackRock said in recent interviews that investors should be 100% in stocks.  Byron Wien at Blackstone talked about revising his S&P 500 target to 1,500 from 1,400.  Barron’s is on the bandwagon (its Dow 15,000 cover), and even the ghoulish Roubini is positive, at least for now.  Every investor has to judge how much capital they will risk on this experiment.  Our risk-taking is more moderate than the ones mentioned; we own a bit less equities than usual (5%-10% under “normal” allocations), with the difference in credit, hedge funds, distressed real estate and gold/oil, coupled with an underweight to government bonds.  We will see how it turns out in the end.   There’s no denying the ferocious bid that free money can put under financial assets.  At this stage, European money-printing in particular has created a lot more market lift than I anticipated.

Some argue that the US economic expansion is the driver behind the rally.  No disagreement about positive signs (seeRxUSA from Feb 8), but let’s be realistic: US growth is projected to be ~2.5% for 2012.  That’s better than last year’s 1.7%, but still below the 3% growth rate that lost George HW Bush the “It’s the economy, stupid” election in 1992.  Some argue that profits are the driver, and they are doing well.  But their strength did not prevent market relapses in 2010 and 2011, and look at where a lot of these profits come from.  If compensation grew at trends comparable to prior recoveries, a big chunk of current-cycle profits would disappear.  This doesn’t mean that today’s profits aren’t real; it just means they come with related costs, such as weak household income and bloated government budget deficits, which have a cost as well (don’t they?).

Some argue that European growth surprised positively in Q4, but the surprises were confined to France and Germany.  The periphery is in recession and expected to remain that way, and the Netherlands had a small decline as well.  The best argument for optimism has been the amount of fear that was priced into markets.  As shown on p.3, real earnings yields on the S&P 500 last November were as high as they have been in many decades, and are still on the cheap side of history.  Still today, the cost of buying out of the money puts is very high; a lot of people want disaster protection, in case the experiment goes wrong.

To sum up, super-easy monetary policy supports markets right now, after reversing last fall’s market collapse and near-default experience in Europe. By the way, add Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Australia, Chile and Thailand to the club, since they also cut policy rates.  On China, while it cut bank reserve requirements for the 2nd time after 12 increases, its money supply target is still tight (see p.3), so we do not expect that much total easing.  Based on things central bankers look at, it appears most will keep money machines pumping for a while longer, and give the private sector a chance to get back on its feet again.

Risk #1: Iran. I was struck by Dennis Ross’ February 14th NYT Op-Ed indicating that sanctions are working, and that Iran may be ready to talk.  Ross, a former State Department and National Security Council official for both parties, is a good source.   The last two US Defense Secretaries also do not appear anxious to engage militarily, citing “unintended consequences”, and the Israeli Mossad also appears to have major concerns (see Ronan Bergman’s excellent January 25 NYT piece).  Anticipating more sanctions, Iran announced oil export bans to the UK and France (which weren’t buying much Iranian oil), and repositioned a warship near Syria.   The good news: since July 2010, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE ramped up production by 2 mm bpd (see chart, p3), and increased Libyan/Iraqi output can help as well, eventually on the order of around 1.5 mm bpd.  But oil prices are rising, out of the fear that the situation will escalate, and perhaps as a reflection of unlimited money creation.

Risk #2: the Bay of PIIGS. I expect the EU to soldier on with its failed Greek austerity program until it dies of social, political and economic exhaustion.  In the near term, it looks like Greek leaders will support austerity plans even after the April elections (if they happen).  As noted last week in greater detail, Greece’s government debt of 145% of GDP (yes, that’s after private sector debt forgiveness) will mostly be owed to the official sector.  That should reduce the market impact of what happens from here, unless depression-like conditions bring Greece’s ill-fated involvement in the Euro to an abrupt end.  In that case, it might take even more than the 2.7 trillion Euros already printed by the ECB to calm things down again.

Who knew that unlimited money printing ($6 trillion and counting, since the fall of 2007) would be such a clean and simple solution to the world’s problems?  I would love to read a book called “Reliable Central Bank Exit Strategies”, but I don’t think it has been written yet.  Enjoy the ride.

Michael Cembalest

Chief Investment Officer

Supplemental charts: the high cost of put options, economic slack in the OECD, attractive real S&P earnings yields, who made up for Libya production’s decline, and how China is still focused on inflation despite cutting reserve requirements:

The first chart shows the cost of hedging with out of the money put options.  Currently, as puts become farther out of the money, implied volatility and option premiums rise. As call options become farther out of the money, implied volatility flattens. There is normally a skew  like this, but this is as steep as it has been in many years.  The second chart shows the“OECD output gap”, an estimate of the deviation between current and potential output. When it’s negative, it means that aggregate demand is running below aggregate supply, creating deflationary pressure.   Other measures, such as US capacity utilization, have been rising more quickly.  In the past, the Fed tightened well before capacity utilization hit its peak, but not when labor markets were this weak.

Corrections Department

Last week’s, we stated that the President’s budget excludes charitable deductions from the limitations on deductions imposed on high income taxpayers.  That was incorrect; charitable deductions would be limited as well.  Apologies to all charities.

OECD: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

BEA: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

BPD: Barrels per day

EMU: European Economic and Monetary Union

UAE: United Arab Emirates

PIIGS: An acronym that for better or worse has become part of the vernacular of the debt crisis (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain)

The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Cembalest and may differ from those of other J.P. Morgan employees and affiliates.  This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further, the views expressed herein may differ from that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports.  The above summary/prices/quotes/statistics have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but we do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. References to the performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan.  It is a proxy for client performance and may not represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensed for specific activities.  Bank, trust and investment management services are provided by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A, and its affiliates.  Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), Member NYSE, FINRA and SIPC. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”); are not deposits or other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates; and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with your J.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation.  This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may increase the risk of investment loss, can be highly illiquid, are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum which fully describes all terms, conditions, and risks.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice.  Accordingly, any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties.  Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.

© 2012 JPMorgan Chase & Co; All rights reserved

This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at

This entry was posted in Economy, Market Forecasts. Bookmark the permalink.