{"id":2103,"date":"2012-10-22T12:10:48","date_gmt":"2012-10-22T17:10:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/?page_id=2103"},"modified":"2012-11-20T12:58:29","modified_gmt":"2012-11-20T17:58:29","slug":"conference-papers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/conferences\/2008-performance-incentives\/conference-papers\/","title":{"rendered":"Conference Papers"},"content":{"rendered":"

All resources posted are in the name of the author(s) and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the National Center on Performance Incentives or sponsoring agencies. Questions about the research, recommendations, and policy recommendations contained within these working papers should be directed to the author(s).<\/p>\n

Missouri’s Teacher Career Ladder Program<\/a><\/h3>\n
Kevin Booker and Steven Glazerman, Mathematica Policy Research<\/h5>\n

Teacher Incentives in Developing Countries: Recent Experimental Evidence from Kenya<\/a><\/h3>\n
Paul Glewwe, Nauman Ilias, and Michael Kremer<\/h5>\n

The Politics of Teacher Pay Reform<\/a><\/h3>\n
Dan Goldhaber, University of Washington<\/h5>\n

Collective Bargaining in Education and Pay for Performance<\/a><\/h3>\n
Jane Hannaway, Urban Institute & Andrew J. Rotherham, Education Sector<\/h5>\n

Teacher Attitudes Toward Pay for Performance: Evidence from Hillsborough County, Florida<\/a><\/h3>\n
Brian Jacob, University of Michigan Matthew Springer, Vanderbilt University<\/h5>\n

Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Teacher Pay<\/a><\/h3>\n
Julia E. Koppich, J. Koppich & Associates<\/h5>\n

Performance Incentives in Texas: Why Schools Chose Not to Participate<\/a><\/h3>\n
Jessica L. Lewis and Matthew G. Springer, Vanderbilt<\/h5>\n

From Data to Bonuses: A Case Study of the Issues Related to Awarding Teachers Pay on the Basis of Their Students’ Progress<\/a><\/h3>\n
Daniel McCaffrey, Bing Han, and J.R. Lockwood, RAND Corporation<\/h5>\n

Value-Added and Other Methods for Measuring School Performance<\/a><\/h3>\n
Robert H. Meyer and Michael S. Christian, University of Wisconsin-Madison<\/h5>\n

Teacher Incentives in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from India<\/a><\/h3>\n
K. Muralidharan, Harvard University and V. Sundararaman, The World Bank<\/h5>\n

Designing Incentive Systems for Schools<\/a><\/h3>\n
Derek Neal<\/h5>\n

Performance-Based Pay in the Federal Government<\/a><\/h3>\n
Steve Nelson, retired, United States Merit Systems Protection Board<\/h5>\n

Market-Based Pay Reforms for Teachers<\/a><\/h3>\n
Michael J. Podgursky, University of Missouri-Columbia<\/h5>\n

Holding Accountability to Account: How Scholarship and Experience in Other Fields Inform Exploration of Performance Incentives in Education<\/a><\/h3>\n
Richard Rothstein, Economic Policy Institute<\/h5>\n

A Legal Perspective on Performance-Based Pay for Teachers<\/a><\/h3>\n
James E. Ryan, University of Virginia<\/h5>\n

Do Teacher Effect Estimates Persist When Teachers Move to Schools with Different Socioeconomic Environments?<\/a><\/h3>\n
William Sanders & S.Paul Wright, SAS Institute, Warren Langevin, Vanderbilt<\/h5>\n

Impact of the Teacher Advancement Program on Student Test Score Gains: Findings from an Independent Appraisal<\/a><\/h3>\n
Matthew G. Springer, Dale Ballou, and Art (Xiao) Peng<\/h5>\n

Characteristics and Determinants of Teacher-Designed Pay for Performance Plans: Evidence from Texas’ Governor’s Educator Excellence Grant Program<\/a><\/h3>\n
Lori Taylor, Matthew Springer, and Mark Ehlert<\/h5>\n

Teacher Salary Bonuses in North Carolina<\/a><\/h3>\n
Jacob L. Vigdor, Duke University<\/h5>\n

Teacher Effectiveness, Mobility, and Attrition in Florida: A Descriptive Anaysis<\/a><\/h3>\n
Martin West, Brown University & Matthew Chingos, Harvard University<\/h5>\n

The Effect of Performance-Pay in Little Rock, Arkansas on Student Achievement<\/a><\/h3>\n
M. Winters, J. Greene, G. Ritter, & R. Marsh, University of Arkansas<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

All resources posted are in the name of the author(s) and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the National Center on Performance Incentives or sponsoring agencies. Questions about the research, recommendations, and policy recommendations contained within these working papers should be directed to the author(s). Missouri’s Teacher Career Ladder Program Kevin Booker…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":853,"featured_media":0,"parent":2087,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2103","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/853"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2103"}],"version-history":[{"count":61,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2115,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2103\/revisions\/2115"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.vanderbilt.edu\/performanceincentives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}