From our initial introduction to Frankenstein’s creation, we’re presented with descriptions meant to incite perceptions of disgust and lead us to empathize with Frankenstein’s disappointment in the outward appearance of the creature. Frankenstein’s immediate regret for having “worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body” (36) leads him to subjectively criticize the creature. In Frankenstein’s eyes, this creature failed to meet his expectations, ruining “the beauty of the dream (36).” After having suffered “infinite pains” in the process of forming this new life, he cannot accept that his creation isn’t the beautiful creature he selected. Shelley conveys this dissatisfaction by utilizing dehumanizing language, referring to it as a “demoniacal corpse” and “wretch,”among other terms. Our understanding of this creature is therefore prematurely clouded by a vision of something nonhuman. Frankenstein’s expectations were so great such that he now sees his work as a total failure, meaning he focuses solely on the negatives and sees no reason to attempt to befriend the creature and potentially find positives from his efforts. In choosing to dehumanize his creation and abandon him from the get-go, Frankenstein sets himself up for his own dehumanization; Frankenstein’s lack of attention toward the creature leaves his creation lost in the world, and is likely responsible for the killings of those close to Frankenstein. This brings up the debate over whether we, as humans, have a responsibility to nurture what we bring into this world to prevent our creations from becoming lost without that necessary social contact.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Andrew Marriott on Juxtaposition of Stories
- Andrew Marriott on Juxtaposition of Stories
- John Bogdon on Murakmi’s Visual Foreshadowing; Paying Homage to Michaelanglo’s Artistic Antics
- Imani Gaines on Binaries in Hard-boiled Wonderland
- Weslyn Lu on Binaries in Hard-boiled Wonderland
Archives
Categories
Meta
There are some really good points here, and the last question that you present is really interesting! I think this situation of nurturing our creations can be compared to the duty of a parent over a child. There is an immediate, natural, and innate responsibility to care for something that we ourselves have brought into the world because it would be immoral to do otherwise. To leave a creature as naive and innocent as a baby to fend for itself would be a cruel act, and one that is punishable by law in our society. If we establish the monster as having human qualities, than it should be considered equally cruel for Frankenstein to have abandoned his creation. However, a parent cannot always be blamed for a child’s actions because eventually the child does become his or her own person. How s/he was raised will only go so far.