Home » Publications » Camilla Benbow

Camilla Benbow

Patricia Rodes Hart Dean of Education and Human Development
Peabody College
MSC 329, Peabody Station
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN 37203
Phone: (615) 322-8407
Fax:     (615) 322-8501
Email:  camilla.benbow@vanderbilt.edu

 

CV in PDF

 

 

 

Publications in PDF (Refereed)

Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836. View in PDF

Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2013).  Who rises to the top? Early Indicators. Psychological Science, 24, 648-659. View in PDF

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM accomplishments among mathematically precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 176-198. View in PDF

Ferriman-Robertson, K., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346-351. View in PDF

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860-871. View in PDF

Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and sex differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 517-532. View in PDF

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817-835. View in PDF

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957-961.  View in PDF

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51. View in PDF

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.                   View in PDF

Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 397-420. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316-345. View in PDF

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (2006). Julian C. Stanley, Jr. (1918-2005). American Psychologist, 61, 251-252. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194-199. View in PDF

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Vocational achievement and creativity among intellectually precocious youth: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484-492.             View in PDF

Bleske-Rechek, A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2004). Meeting the educational needs of special populations: Advanced Placement’s role in developing exceptional human capital. Psychological Science, 15, 217-224.         View in PDF

Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math/science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 785-794. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvorson, M. B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12, 309-317. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729. View in PDF

Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.      View in PDF

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150. View in PDF

Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 777-786. View in PDF

Fisher, P. J., Turic, D., Williams, N. M., McGiffin, P., Asherson, P., Ball, D., Craig, I., Eley, T., Hill, L., Chorney, K., Chorney, M. J., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Plomin, R., & Owen, M. J. (1999). DNA pooling identifies QTLs for general cognitive ability in children on chromosome 4. Human Molecular Genetics, 8, 915-922.

Hill, L., Asherson, P., Ball, D., Eley, T., Ninomiya, T., Fisher, P. J., Turic, D., McGiffin, P., Owen, M. J., Chorney, K., Chorney, M. J., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Thompson, L. A., Plomin, R. (1999). DNA pooling and dense marker maps: A systematic search for genes for cognitive ability. NeuroReports, 10, 843-848.

Ball, D., Hill, L., Eley, T. C., Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Owen, M., McGuffin, P., & Plomin, R. (1998). Dopamine markers and general cognitive ability. NeuroReports, 9, 347-349.

Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Seese, N., Owen, M. J., McGuffin, P., Daniels, J., Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Eley, T. C., Plomin, R. (1998). A quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with cognitive ability in children. Psychological Science, 9, 159-166.

Petrill, S. A., Ball, D., Hill, L., Plomin, R., McClearn G. E., Smith, D. L., Chorney, K., Chorney, M., Seese, N., Detterman, D. K., Thompson, L. A., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Daniels, J., Owen, M. J., & McGuffin, P. (1998). Failure to replicate a QTL association between a DNA marker identified by EST00083 and IQ. Intelligence, 25, 179-184.

Petrill, S. A., Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Smith, D. L., Vignetti, S., Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Daniels, J., Owne, M., & McGuffin, P. (1998). No association between general cognitive ability and the A1 Allele of the D2 dopamine receptor gene. Behavior Genetics, 27, 29-31.

Schmidt, D. B., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1998). Validity of assessing educational-vocational preference dimensions among intellectually talented 13-year olds. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 436-453.           View in PDF

Achter, J. A., Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Multipotentiality among the gifted: Is it a pervasive problem? Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 2-12.

Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among intellectually gifted: It was never there and already it’s vanishing. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76. View in PDF

Alexander, J. E., O’Boyle, M. W., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Developmentally advanced EEG alpha power in gifted male and female adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 25-31.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How current educational equity policies place able students at risk. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-293. View in PDF

Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the Study of Values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443-451.

Petrill, S. A., Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Smith, D. L., Vignetti, S., Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K., Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Daniels, J., Owen, M., & McGuffin, P. (1996). DNA markers associated with general and specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 23, 191-203.

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in math college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697-705.

Haier, R., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralization in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 405-414.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Optimal development of talent: Respond educationally to individual differences in personality. Educational Forum, 59, 381-392.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interest among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 90-94.

O’Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality, and associated brain activity in the intellectually gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 415-443.

Sanders, C. E., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Does the Defining Issues Test measure psychological phenomena distinct from verbal ability?: An examination of Lykken’s query. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 498-504. View in PDF

Gibbons, F. X., Benbow, C. P., & Gerrard, M. (1994). From top dog to bottom half: Social comparison strategies in response to poor performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 638-652.

O’Boyle, M. W., Gill, H. S., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1994). Concurrent finger-tapping in mathematically gifted males: Evidence for enhanced right hemisphere involvement during linguistic processing. Cortex, 30, 519-526.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). Type of stimulus mediates the relationship between performance and type of precocity. Intelligence, 19, 337-357.

Casey, M. B., Winner, E., Benbow, C. P., Hayes, R., & DaSilva, D. (1993). Skill at image generation: Handedness interacts with strategy preference for individuals majoring in spatial fields. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 57-77.

Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in math and science between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences in the top one percent of ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.

Benbow, C. P. (1992). Introduction to the Special Issue – Challenging the gifted: Grouping and acceleration. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 59.

Benbow, C. P. (1992). Progress in gifted education – Everywhere but here! Gifted Child Today, 15, 15-19.

Benbow, C. P., Argo, T. A., & Glass, L. W. (1992). Meeting of the needs of gifted students in rural areas through acceleration. Gifted Child Today, 15, 15-19.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math/science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66. View in PDF

Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Nonacademic correlates of satisfaction with accelerative programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 699-723.

Benbow, C. P., Arjmand, O., & Walberg, H. J. (1991) Productivity predictors among the intellectually talented. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 215-223.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Differential enhancement of working memory with mathematical and vertical precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 48-60.

O’Boyle, M. W., Alexander, J. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Enhanced right hemisphere activation in the mathematically precocious: A preliminary EEG investigation. Brain and Cognition, 17, 138-153.

Swiatek, M., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). A 10-year longitudinal follow-up of participation in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138-150.

Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.

Benbow, C. P. (1990). Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A pilgrim in research in her time and ours. Roeper Review, 12, 210-215.

Benbow, C. P. (1990). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Further thoughts. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 13, 196.

Benbow, C. P., & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441.

Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1990). Cognitive profiles of verbally and mathematically precocious students: Implications for identification of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 21-26.

Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Effects of high school course-work and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 866-875.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. (1990). Mathematically talented students show enhanced problem translation and enhanced short-term memory for digit and spatial information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 420-429.

Dauber, S. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 10-15.

O’Boyle, M., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Enhanced right hemisphere involvement during cognitive processing may relate to intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 28, 211-216.

Richardson, T. M., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on social and emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464-470.

Raymond, C. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1989). Educational encouragement by parents: Its relationship to precocity and gender. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 144-151.

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability among the intellectually talented: Their characterization, consequences, and possible explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-183, 225-232. View in PDF

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex-related differences in precocious mathematical reasoning ability: Not illusory, not easily explained. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 217-232.

Benbow, C. P. (1987). Possible biological correlates of precocious mathematical reasoning ability. Trends in Neuroscience, 10, 17-20.

Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110.

Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24, 719-725.

Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 425-436.

Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 1-18.

Raymond, C. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Gender differences in mathematics: A function of parental support and student sex-typing? Developmental Psychology, 22, 808-819.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Constructing educational bridges between high school and college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 111-113.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Differential course-taking hypothesis revisited (A commentary). American Educational Research Journal, 4, 469-473.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Opening doors for the gifted. American Education, 19, 44-46.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029-1031. View in PDF

Benbow, C. P., Stanley, J. C., Kirk, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (1983). Structure of intelligence of intellectually precocious children and in their parents. Intelligence, 7, 129-152.

Benbow, C. P., Zonderman, A. B., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Assortative marriage and the familiarity of cognitive abilities in families of extremely gifted students. Intelligence, 7, 153-161.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College and University, 58, 361-371.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). SMPY’s first decade: Ten years of posing problems and solving them. Journal of Special Education, 17, 11- 25.

Zak, P. M., Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). AP exams: The way to go! Roeper Review, 6, 100-101.

Zak, P. M., Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Several factors associated with success as an undergraduate chemistry major in college. College and University, 58, 303-312.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Intellectually talented boys and girls: Educational profiles. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 82-88.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1982). Educating mathematically precocious youths: Twelve policy recommendations. Educational Researcher, 11, 4-9.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1981-82, Winter). Using the SAT to find intellectually talented seventh graders. College Board Review, 122, 2-7, 26.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Intellectually talented students: Family profiles. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 119-122.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264. View in PDF

Publications (Other)

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Recognizing spatial intelligence: Our schools, and our society, must do more to recognize spatial reasoning, a key kind of intelligence. Scientific American: Minds Matter. View Online

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Choosing Excellence [A response]. American Psychologist, 56, 76-77.               View in PDF

Benbow, C. P. (1990). Gender differences: Searching for some facts [Commentary]. American Psychologist, 45, 988.

Benbow, C. P., Napolski, A. J., & Glass, L. W. (1990). CY-TAG (Challenges for Youth-Talented and Gifted): An opportunity offered by SMPY and Iowa State University. Illinois Council for Gifted Journal.

Benbow, C. P., & Richardson, T. M. (1987). SMPY at ISU. Ontario Mathematical Gazette, 25, 23-25.

Benbow, C. P. (1985). Reporting on the impact of media reports: An accurate reflection [Letter to the editor]. Educational Researcher, 14, 30.

Benbow, C. P. (1984). Achievement in mathematics [Letter to the editor]. Science, 223, 1248.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). 15:1 certainly isn’t catching up! [Letter to the editor]. Psychological Reports, 52, 656.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1982). Huge sex ratios at upper end [Letter to the editor]. American Psychologist, 37(8), 972.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1982). Misleading omission [Letter to the editor]. Contemporary Psychology, 27(5), 404.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1981). Mathematical ability: Is sex a factor? [A response]. Science, 212, 118 & 121.

Books

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (Eds.). (1996). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chapters

Stambaugh, T., & Benbow, C. P. (2010).  Philosophy and policies to guide middle school mathematics instruction: Issues of identification, acceleration, and grouping.  In M. Saul, S. Assouline, and L. Sheffield (Eds.), The Peak in the Middle (pp. 1-28).  Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (2009). Extending Sandra Scarr’s ideas about development to the longitudinal study of intellectually precocious youth. In K. McCartney and R. A. Weinberg (Eds.), Experience and development: A Festschrift in Honor of Sandra Scarr (pp. 231-252). Taylor & Francis: London.

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Aligning promise and passion: Best practices for educating intellectually talented youth. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.) Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 693-716). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Personal attributes for the development of scientific expertise. In S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams (Eds.) Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 79-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G. & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Morelock, M. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and the physical sciences among the gifted: An inorganic-organic distinction. In K. A. Keller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 627-641).

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Sanjani, H. (1999). Our future leaders in science: Who are they and can we find them early? In N. Colangelo, & S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 3, pp. 59-70). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychological Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1998). Acceleration as a method for meeting the academic needs of intellectually talented children. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 279-294). Denver, CO: Love.

Benbow, C. P. (1998). Grouping intellectually advanced students for instruction. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 261-278). Denver, CO: Love.

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Intellectually talented children: How can we best meet their needs? In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 155-169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, B. (1996). Impact of the SMPY model and programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 266-300). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Benbow, C. P., & Wolins, L. (1996). Utility of out-of-level testing for gifted 7th and 8th graders using SAT-M: An examination of item bias. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 333-346). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Minor, L. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Construct validity of the SAT-M: A comparative study of high school students and gifted seventh graders. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 347-361). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Boatman, T. A., Davis, K. G., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Best practices in gifted education. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, (Vol. III, pp. 1083-1096). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1994). Individual differences among the mathematically gifted: Their educational and vocational implications. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 83-100). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): Its planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. Subotnik & K. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies in contemporary gifted education (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Consequences of gender differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Some biological linkages. In M. Haug, R. E. Whalen, C. Aaron, & K. L. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behaviour (pp. 87-110). London, England: Kluwer Academic Publishers in the NATO Series.

Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some gender differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In K. Ackerill (Ed.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 44-66). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1993). Cognitive differences among the gifted: A review and new data. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current Topics in Human Intelligence (Vol. 3, pp. 85-120). New York: Ablex.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Sanders, C. E. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted: An outcome of contrasting attributes for personal fulfillment in the world of work. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (pp. 575-602). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1992). Mathematical talent: Its origins and consequences. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings of the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 95-123). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.

Stanley, J. C., Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., & Dauber, S. L. (1992). Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings of the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 42-65). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1991). Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of acceleration: A neglected resource. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education (Vol. 4, pp. 23-36). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1990). Mathematically talented children: Can acceleration meet their educational needs? In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (pp. 154-165). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Benbow, C. P. (1990). Mathematical talent and females: From a biological perspective. In W. Wiecerkowski & T. M. Prado (Ed.), Hochbegabte Madchen (pp. 95-113). Bad Honnef, W. Germany: K. H. Bock.

O’Boyle, M. W., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Handedness and its relationship to talent and ability. In S. Coren (Ed.), Left-handedness: Behavioral implications and anomalies (pp. 343-372). North-Holland Advances in Psychology Series.

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Neuropsychological perspectives on mathematical talent. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 48-69). Guilford Press.

Benbow, C. P., & Benbow, R. M. (1987). Extreme mathematical talent: A hormonally induced ability? In D. Ottoson (Ed.), Duality and unity of the brain (pp. 147-157). Houndsmills, England: The MacMillan Press, Ltd.

Benbow, C. P. (1986). SMPY’s model for teaching mathematically precocious students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models in programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 1-25). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1986). SMPY’s 15 years of research in a nutshell. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), The Richardson Study: A catalyst for policy change in gifted education (pp. 39-43). Evanston, IL: Center for Talent Development (Northwestern University).

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Benbow, C. P. (1984). Sex differences in mathematics. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 302-303). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Also published in R. J. Corsini, (Ed.), (1987), Concise encyclopedia of psychology (p. 1026). New York: Wiley & Sons.

Benbow, C. P., & Benbow, R. M. (1984). Biological correlates of high mathematical reasoning ability. In G. J. DeVries, J. P. C. DeBruin, H. B. M. Uylings, & M. A. Corner (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain – the relation between structure and function. Progress in brain research (Vol. 61) (pp. 469-490). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1984). Gender and the science major. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 2, pp. 165-196). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.

Benbow, C. P. (1983). Adolescence of the mathematically precocious: A five year longitudinal study. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 9-37). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY’s first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 51-78). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). An eight-year evaluation of SMPY: What was learned? In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 205-214). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fox, L. H., Benbow, C. P., & Perkins, S. (1983). An accelerated mathematics program for girls: A longitudinal evaluation. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 113-138). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). Intellectually talented students: The key is curricular flexibility. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 259-281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reviews/Technical Reports, etc.

Benbow, C. P. (1998). The psychology of giftedness: Review of Ellen Winner’s Gifted Children. Contemporary Psychology, 43, 13-15.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). An opportunity for “accuracy”: Rejoinder to Gardner’s “Response on four fronts.” Contemporary Psychology, 40, 939-940.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). An opportunity for empiricism: Review of Howard Gardner’s Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Contemporary Psychology, 40, 935-938. View in PDF

Benbow, C. P. (1992). The American high school mathematics examination. In J. J. Kramer & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), The Eleventh Mental Measurement Yearbook (pp. 29-30). Lincoln, NE: Buros.

Benbow, C. P. (1992). Mathematics 7. In J. J. Kramer & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), The Eleventh Mental Measurement Yearbook (pp. 513-514). Lincoln, NE: Buros.

Benbow, C. P. (1991). [Review of Intelligence and giftedness: The contributions of heredity and early environment.] Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 151-153.

Ratcliff, J. L., Benbow, C., Bieber, T., Ding, P., Lee, N. H., Strahan, R. F., Swanson, W., & Thomas, D. (1988). Development and testing of a cluster-analytic model for identifying coursework patterns associated with general learned abilities of college students (Report No. OERI-R- 86-0016). Ithaca College: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Benbow, C. P. (1986). [Review of Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation]. Child Development Abstracts and Bibliography, 60, 1.


 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Back Home