Balance

I watched impatiently as my mom tried with the best of her ability to type in a simple address into the GPS. When I saw the street light turn green, I hastily said, “Here, Mommy, just give it to me. I got it. Just drive.” I took the GPS from her, typed in the address with ease, and resumed texting on my phone. As she turned her attention back to the road, she said to me, “I just do not understand how you kids know how to use technology so easily. When I was young, we did not need all of this electricity. Stop wasting your eyes on the screen! Look outside at all of the beautiful nature in the world around you.”

I put down my phone to look outside the car. Beautiful tall trees outlined the sky as we sped past a green flurry of grass. One second later, those tall trees turned into towering skyscrapers and the green flurry of grass turned into a smooth strip of pavement. The beautiful nature my mom told me to focus on had been replaced with the very technology she told me to take a break from.

Today, man-made structures and technology seem to have “taken over” our lives and replaced our appreciation of the natural beauty of the world. At least, that is what my mom and Odelia Kaly, the author of “Robot Apocalypse”, believe. In her essay, Kaly argues, “instead of these devices representing our collective progress and enhancing our quality of life, in the long run they are depleting our quality of life by inhibiting our ability to grow.” Kaly’s belief is that technology hinders our ability to be independent and value the true beauty of life around us.

On the other hand, my dad, who owns a cell phone technology company, believes the opposite. He thinks that technology has helped humans come very far. For one, he would not have made it to where he is today without technology’s progress giving him the opportunity to move to another country and start his company from scratch. He accredits much of his success and independence to his ability to understand technology. He believes that technology has been great to humankind and wishes to understand it even better.

Personally I do not think the same as either of them. I believe that there should be a balance between using technology and allowing it to control our lives. The two forces, technology and nature, are both so powerful that we seem to constantly feel the need to choose between the two. Some, like my dad, argue that we need to understand technology to the best of our ability and use it to better the quality of our lives. My dad believes technology has helped us become more independent and has given us the chance to further our abilities. Others, like my mom and Odelia Kaly, believe that technology is a negative presence in our lives, and we should work on connecting with nature and enjoying what it has to offer. Both my mom and Kaly would say that depending on technology prevents us from becoming more independent, because we rely on it so much that we will lose our sense of accomplishing our own tasks.

While both of these views have valid arguments to them, I have come to my own conclusion that we should combine technology and nature. Instead of allowing the two forces to “battle” it out, we should use both forces so that they can build off each other and work together in a way that will better our lives as a whole. We do not need to “pick” one side or the other. Humans do not need to decide whether technology is good or evil. We should focus on allowing technology and nature to coexist and letting them better each other. Nature can inspire technological inventions, and technology can help nature thrive. For example, the need for different energy sources has pushed humans to create different forms of energy intake, such as solar energy panels. These solar energy panels can in turn help the planet become a better environment for its inhabitants, as there is less of a dependency on fossil fuel resources. Another example is human medicine. Sicknesses and diseases have called for and inspired different medicines and cures to be created, and in return these medicines and cures that technology has created have allowed humans to live longer and healthier lives.

Technology and nature have certainly been two seemingly opposing forces. However, by looking out the window, you can see fields of green grass and tall trees in one section, and rows of pavement and skyscrapers in the next. But instead of seeing them as separate sections, we should focus on the bigger picture, which shows that these two forces, technology and nature, coexist and thrive off of each other to combine and create an even greater force that the two could not accomplish alone.

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Balance

  1. Moon says:

    I really enjoyed how you originally set out the two “standard” perspectives and then fused them to create your own. I also really liked the imagery of the change from a line of trees to a line of manmade objects because it set the tone of the essay. However, I think that the portions where you describe your parents’ positions can be shortened and combined to avoid some redundant phrasing. Your conclusion was great in that it set forth your argument while revisiting the imagery from the first paragraph.

  2. Gina says:

    I really like how you presented several schools of thought in your essay. The use of the two polarized views of your mother and father informs the reader well of the most extreme viewpoints and ultimately allows for a better understanding of your personal viewpoint. However, since you present the first two sides as examples of two very different beliefs to inform the reader, I think they should be more balanced. When I read it I feel like your mother’s viewpoint had more attention. Perhaps bringing in a second source to support your father’s viewpoint or going a little more in depth for his side can balance it a little more as not to discredit one side over the other (since neither of them are ultimately what you argue). I also really liked the personal touch on the essay—the anecdote at the beginning and the use of your parents as representations of the different beliefs.

  3. Christina says:

    This essay has a really good flow, starting from the personal anecdote and smoothly transitioning to the broader idea that nature and technology can coexist. I also like how the argument isn’t extreme, it’s rational and gives logical explanations for why the issue of technology isn’t just black and white. But I think that the fifth paragraph is a bit repetitive in that a lot of it summarizes the two viewpoints already given in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs. I think it would be helpful to alter that 5th paragraph so that it focuses more on how to integrate technology and nature.

Comments are closed.