Daniel Weinfeld
Picture a crowded library. Men, women, and children reading, writing, and learning in a respectful and quiet public environment. Today, chances are nearly everyone in the library is using a computer. Laptop owners are taking advantage of WIFI availability, and those without personal computers and internet access at home are using those library resources for business, research, or plain enjoyment. Meanwhile, the surrounding stacks of books, periodicals, and other print materials remain largely untouched as their digital counterparts render them increasingly obsolete. This shift towards online and digitally accessible materials has sparked a discussion with many questioning the importance of printed books and libraries. While this argument has its merits, these changes are being misinterpreted in a negative light instead of appreciated for what it is: great progress in public access to information and learning. Libraries are as important today as they have ever been because of the imperative services they offer to the public and the freedom of information and expression they represent.
Public libraries have taken on new roles in the community as a result of new technology and the need for public access to online resources for academic purposes, job searches, healthcare coverage and other government benefits, and other financial services. Without access to all of this information, people in urban areas, particularly of lower socioeconomic status, can be at a significant disadvantage in education, work, and financial security. According to a piece by Susan Crawford for the New York Times, 92% of African Americans and 86% of Latinos surveyed felt that free access to computers and the internet at public libraries is “very important”. Unfortunately, the same article reported that 87% of urban libraries do not have enough computers, and only 57% of the same libraries offer high-speed internet. While those conditions could certainly be improved, it is still important to recognize the significance of these services that public libraries are providing for communities of all shapes and sizes.
Another important point in this discussion is the freedom and democratic principles present in the public library system. While this may seem like a lofty argument, it is based in the very principles upon which our nation was founded. Freedom of information and expression are core values of the American people, and libraries today, as they always have, provide the public with an outlet for both. The privilege to choose what one reads and writes may be one often taken for granted in our society, but it is not a luxury that all people enjoy. This freedom lives and breathes in libraries; in the tales of our history, the access to endless information online, and in the right to check out any book no matter how unpopular or controversial the ideas within it may be. Luis Herrera, city librarian of San Francisco, wrote that libraries are “a true American invention… a gathering place for civic and cultural engagement and a trusted place for conserving culture [2]. In a stand-up comedy special on television the other night, a comic delivered a bit, to raucous laughter and applause, about oppressive dictators throughout the twentieth century. He joked that all the armies and nuclear weapons in the world never scared those enemies of peace and American values, it was always books and ideas that they were afraid of. As cheesy as it may sound, I doubt that Hitler, Mussolini, or Chairman Mao would have approved of the information and freedom available at public libraries in the United States.
In sum, libraries still matter. The fact that print is no longer the only means of communicating and accessing information does not diminish the enduring importance of public libraries in our communities. Libraries still do, and will continue to offer the public resources that we want and need. Information and knowledge are synonymous with freedom and democracy. 100% of our public libraries now offer internet access [2]. That is something to be proud of. Americans of all ethnicities and backgrounds deserve free access to the information they need for themselves and for the betterment of our society. So long as they offer the opportunity for learning and enjoyment to those who may not be fortunate enough to have it otherwise, and even to those who are, public libraries will remain vital to our communities, and continue to represent the values of democracy and freedom which we all hold dear.
References
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/12/27/do-we-still-need-libraries/libraries-struggle-to-close-the-digital-divide?action=click&module=Search®ion=searchResults%230&version=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%3Faction%3Dclick%26region%3DMasthead%26pgtype%3DHomepage%26module%3DSearchSubmit%26contentCollection%3DHomepage%26t%3Dqry310%23%2Flibraries
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/12/27/do-we-still-need-libraries/libraries-are-more-relevant-than-ever?action=click&module=Search®ion=searchResults%231&version=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%3Faction%3Dclick%26region%3DMasthead%26pgtype%3DHomepage%26module%3DSearchSubmit%26contentCollection%3DHomepage%26t%3Dqry310%23%2Flibraries%2Fsince1851%2Fallresults%2F2%2F
Dan, I think you offered a perfect argumentative essay. The thesis and flow of thoughts are very clear, and your sentence structure, choice of words, and overall tone make this essay really professional. You had a great understanding about contemporary society and public libraries. However, I agree with Preston that your third paragraph is a little too long, especially compared to the rest of your essay. Maybe you can split it or reconstruct it so that the paragraph will not be distracting. Overall, I love the straightforwardness of your essay.
Hey Danny, I liked the clarity and straightforwardness of this essay! I thought you took a creative twist to the idea of what information circulates in libraries, and it made me think of how libraries could indeed be moving with the times of technology. I thought the inclusion of statistics really helped you prove your point. Great job!!
Dan, I wrote a relatively similar essay that made a lot of the same points you make here. I really like how you relate public libraries to the American ideal of freedom and expression. I thought that idea resonated most with me throughout the essay. I also thought your inclusion of articles and studies along with concrete statistics greatly strengthened your argument. I do believe your third paragraph seemed to drag on a bit too long, though, so maybe breaking your paragraph structure up a little bit into smaller, more fluidly readable parts would be beneficial? Anyway, great job, you make some great points about the current state and impact of public libraries
I wrote a very similar essay with a different angle and we both essentially made similar conclusions. I thought that the essay did a good job arguing your thesis, which was very clearly stated. One piece of advice I have is to clean up the claim sentence in your second paragraph. It just seemed a little wordy but other than that good job.
Dan, I like that you supported public libraries by focusing on the efficiency and necessity of technology available in these libraries, instead of just holding on to the sentimentality of books; it made your essay very up to date and logical. I also think that the statistics you provided in the second paragraph were interesting; however, I think it would be helpful if you provided a bit more analysis of these statistics. For example, a majority of people believe that the availability of technology in libraries is very important, yet many libraries do not have enough computers; what does this imply about the efforts people are making to equip libraries with technology, etc.? Overall, great essay!