A Top Ten State of Mind

I live and breathe for lists. I list everything. I keep my to-do list as my prized possession. In fact, writing this without using a list is proving incredibly difficult for me. With the help of the work and research of scholars, I’m hoping to convince you of the importance of lists. 

 So here goes nothing… These are my

Top 5 Reasons Why Lists Are Essential to Humanity.

 

1.    Essential to Modern Journalism.

I don’t care what anyone says. In this day and age we want information and we want it NOW. This is why social media outlets such as Twitter have evolved in such a way. Top Ten lists, in turn, grab the attention of readers. In fact, Top Tens more often than not bring the most amount of traffic to particular sites and blogs as they prove to be in tune with our addictive nature as humans. Somehow only reading until number 8 on People’s “Top Ten Sexiest Men” would be considered a modern travesty. In fact, people are more likely to click a Top Ten link online than a hefty article. Stuart Fischoff, an expert in media and psychology, comments on humanity’s struggle to juggle information. He responds that, “if we can break things up into chunks of meaningful data, it’s much easier for us to store and remember them.” He remarks that this is precisely why the Top Ten has become increasingly popular in journalism. And more importantly why we, as a fast-paced culture, with a steady flow of information consuming our lives, find ourselves attracted to this structure.

 

2.    Essential to Culture.

“The list is the origin of culture.” Philosopher and scholar, Umberto Eco, claims this statement. He explains that culture desires to “make infinity comprehensible.” Put simply: we want to make sense of our lives. Through lists we’re able to grasp what is incomprehensible. We can dissect what we may not understand and gain new knowledge, which is essential to the development of our societies. Eco further comments that, “The list doesn’t destroy culture; it creates it. The list is the mark of a highly advanced, cultivated society because a list allows us to question the essential definitions. The essential definition is primitive compared with the list.” The list literally adds an efficient aspect to our culture. Through lists, we create culture by making sense of all that is happening around us.

 

3.    Essential to Literature.

Outlines are essentially fancy lists aren’t they? People have been using outlines for years to organize their thoughts. Academically we use them to draw attention to main points and important nuances of our studies. However, lists are a distinct part of literature beyond this. Look back on all of the Shakespeare you may have read in your life. He often uses lists of phrases within his prose starting with “and.” Eco tells us to envision a lover describing his loved one “her smile…and her eyes…and her hair that…and…” This is an aspect of literature, specifically poetry, that we can easily recognize. So, lists are poetic, lists have been essential to literature, lists are an integral part of the way we create and write.

 

4.    Essential to History.

Lists have been around since the beginning of time! Really! In the Book of Genesis the world creation plan consisted of a six-step list. This goes back to the writers of the Bible. If this isn’t convincing enough, I’m not sure what is. Lists have been present throughout history from the 10 Commandments to the 10 Amendments of the Bill of Rights. A proven way to process and record information in the past is the new basis of writing and storing information for the future. Umberto Eco comments that we can find lists if we look to any part of cultural history. He calls the Baroque era “an age of lists.” As definitions were disproved and replaced by new ones, lists proved to be a revolutionary way to process all of these changes. He explains how anything from a series of historic paintings to Galileo’s detailed records about the moon should be considered lists.

 

5.    Essential to Sanity.

Personally I’m fairly certain that I would not be able to function without using lists in my day-to-day life. But, I’m not alone. Studies have proven that writing down tasks stimulates cells in the reticular activating system of our brains to filter all that’s necessary for the brain to process. In other words, when we write things down, we’re more likely to feel compelled to complete them. As these lists leave us craving the rest of the points until we finish, To-Do lists do this even more. The feeling of guilt one has when they have not yet crossed off a particular task or assignment is irreplaceable. In fact, this is a real thing called the Zeigarnik Effect, which is the medical name for this tendency to dwell on incomplete tasks. We’re not crazy! When we don’t complete our lists, we often drive ourselves utterly mad. Lists have always and will always drive me mad. They encompass my life and are my obsessive way of analyzing the world around me.  However, I know I’m not alone. Top Ten lists are on the rise. In our society where we demand the world to be composed in a concise and accessible way, Top Tens are the perfect outlet. I hope my blog will bring satisfaction to you in trying to bring some sanity to the crazy blogosphere covering the Internet today. So feel free to join me and I encourage you open yourselves up to this obsessive Top Tens state of mind.

 

Posted in blog, blogosphere, lists, to-do, top tens, umberto eco | Comments Off on A Top Ten State of Mind

The Top 3 of the 5.

As a newbie to the blogosphere I’ve been venturing into blogs out of my usual interests and across a spectrum from politics to wellness and just about everything else in between. Here are my top three points of five very different blogs. And, for the record, I’m happy to say that I enjoyed them all.

 

Andrew Sullivan Dishes out The Dish

  1. Live blogging the DNC. Sullivan live blogs his entire time at the DNC. He dedicates entire posts to time stamped updates of his days. Throughout the convention, his blog overflows with new information, updates, and insights. Live blogging gives his audience exactly what they’re searching for – a window into what is happening at that very moment at the DNC.
  2. Live tweeting. Just as Sullivan live blogs the convention, he also uses twitter as a source to give and receive information. In fact, his post “Clinton’s Big Speech: Tweet Reax,” is an entire post dedicated to tweets in response to Clinton’s speech at the convention. This creative post is easy-to-read while giving a peak into the views of a variety of politicians.
  3. Easy. The tweet post is a perfect example of how accessible and easy to read Sullivan’s blog proved to be.  I will admit that some of his posts went a little over my head. Sullivan assumes his audience is enthralled in politics as well…and he’s probably right. He writes for his educated audience and they respond.

 

David Roberts: Energy, politics, & more.

  1. Makes energy interesting. Not to say that this topic is not interesting, but Robert’s enthusiasm and knowledge on the subject is clear. His eloquence of his posts tied with his casual and often humorous tone grabs the reader into becoming enthralled with what he or she is reading.
  2. Headlines. On a similar note, Robert’s proves to be expert at headlines. His article, “Behind the scenes at a big mountaintop- mining protest: The good, the bad, & the ugly,” is just one headline that forced me to want to read more. He takes very serious topics and makes his headlines accessible previews of, in short, what the post will be about.
  3. You’re keepin’ us hanging! In comparison to the mainstream blogging of some of the other blogs, Roberts fails to post as frequently. Yes, he posts often. However, if I were an avid fan of his blog I really think I’d be craving more than a post every few days.

 

All is Well: NYTimes Wellness Blog

  1. “Think like a doctor.” This is a feature on the blog that posts medical mysteries and offers their readers to try and crack the case. This week’s focused on a girl who had a mysterious blue tinted color to her skin tone.
  2. In our terms. As the Well blog challenges us to think like doctors, the writers make this possible through the use of simple terms to decode medical myths and issues. I not only understood the issues presented but fully grasped the symptoms or debates surrounding each particular disease or illness that the blog described.
  3. And in our lives. While shedding light on the medical world, Well also acts as a window into the lives of those affected by illness. In a column entitled, “Life, interrupted,” a young cancer patient writes of her day-to-day life during chemo treatments. Though these articles are compelling, Well should really try to hone in more on the steps we could take in our lives to better our health.

 

Say this one 5 times fast: Gizmodo (the Gadget Guide)

  1. Casually humorous. Without an in-your-face funny edge to their posts, Gizmodo’s blog has left me giggling. The “Shit Apple Users Say” as well as “The Stoner Channel” are two video channels updated on their site that were unexpectedly and very casually…hilarious.
  2. Wait, I own one of those! Gizmodo’s constant updates on the newest products and on features of our own products. Maybe it’s just the techy nerd inside of me coming out to play, but this blog leaves me craving new technology.
  3. The display. Blame it on my slight OCD, but I found this to be the easiest blog to navigate through. The clean and simple display along with the side column lining up major one-word headlines made my visits to the site easy and fast.

 

The HuffPost’s Howard Fineman

 

  1. Twitter Lovin’. Having Fineman’s Twitter feed under his heading of the page found to be extremely effective. New to his blog, I immediately found myself reading through his tweets and getting a new preview into his thoughts as well as his sense of character.
  2. Speaking of previews… Fineman does a fantastic job at creating attention grabbing headlines and brief previews into his articles. This technique allows a lot of articles to appear on his blog at once. “The Man Who Is Obama’s Problem” is one of my faves.
  3. These articles are written in English. I admit I know little to nothing about the election. The fact that I dove right into Fineman’s blogs and was able to digest all of the policies under question says a lot… I give much credit to the humorous aids. “Barack Obama’s Greatest Hits” served as a parody on the policies Obama enforced illustrated through the use of popular Billboard hits.
  4. Fineman oh so fine! Fineman earned a special place in my heart (and on this list with a top 4!) with “What the Republicans Didn’t Say in Tampa.” Written as a top ten list he proves that these lists are fun and an effective way to engage audiences.

     

     

Posted in blog, blogosphere, blogs, critiques, fineman, gizmodo, grist, NYTimes, roberts, sullivan, wellness | Comments Off on The Top 3 of the 5.

a speech to remember

“He was the explainer-in-chief without seeming too preachy. He was full of Southern aphorisms without being hokey. And, perhaps most importantly of all, Clinton was quite clearly having a very good time – and he let it show. He adlibbed. He played with the crowd. He smiled and laughed. And, yes, he went on a little too long. But, if you are a student of campaign politics – like we are – what you watched tonight was the work of someone with massive natural ability in the political arena.”

Andrew Sullivan acknowledged this encouraging piece of political commentary, written by Washington Post blogger Chris Cillizza, for its praise of Clinton’s remarks at day two of the Democratic National Convention, and I’d like to second that acknowledgement. Clinton’s speech was great. So great, some say, that he might have just won the election for the Democrats (and even have overshadowed the long awaited appearance of President Obama at tonight’s final rally).

So why was Clinton’s speech so extravagantly and unarguably the best we’ve seen yet? Cillizza claims it’s because of our former president’s incomparable ability to explain. So much so, to say that it was “the work of someone with massive natural ability in the political arena.” So is that it? The best politicians are the ones who can dumb things down for the American public? Who assume the worst of our electorate and plan accordingly? It’s possible.

Ezra Klein, blogger and correspondent for the Washington Post tweeted of the event last night: “A longtime hallmark of Clinton’s speeches is believing that voters want to hear more about policy than they usually get to. And being right.”

So what does it really mean for the political elite to simplify policy for public audiences? Is it for the purpose of engaging MORE voters, or MORE policy? Is it both? Obviously, this strategy seems to have been effective, and presumably an extreme benefit to the Obama campaign. Especially if a political lesson/plug can avoid sounding patronizing for 45 whole minutes. (Sadly, I think that’s longer than the average American attention span).

Keeping up with every detail of a presidential election is apparently as time consuming as full time job – and can actually be one. So who’s to say we couldn’t use a cliff notes version of a political battle every once in a while and isn’t that what conventions are for anyway? Mobilizing voters and simplifying months of campaigning and platform formation down to a few days of speeches? I’m starting to see why Clinton needed that 45 minutes.

As college students preparing to vote for the first time in a presidential election, we have come to a theoretical crossroads. On the precipice of our first ever vote in a presidential election, and our own selfish ambitions, every one of us has a fundamental question to answer. How involved will you be?

Yesterday, the New York Times Well blog featured a post titled, “Organic Food vs. Conventional Food.” It was formatted as a question and answer explaining a Stanford study that proves no link between the nutrient content of organic food verses industrially produced foods. Now, if you know very little about nutrition, or the organic food movement, it would appear to be a provocative and well researched statement – it certainly sounds official to me. It sounded provocative until you realize that the issue lies in the far too belittled point that it’s not about nutrients at all, it’s about pesticides. Yes, they mentioned it, but barely. They even explain that pregnant women should stay away from them. My question is why that’s not the topic of this official-sounding Stanford study. Probably because that’s already been proven. Are we now supposed to ignore the fact that pesticides are harmful to our bodies just because conventionally grown foods aren’t any LESS nutrient-rich than organic foods? I hope not.

The point of this digression is not that I am frustrated with research being done about the health of our food, or the wellness of our bodies. I merely would like to point out that for a lot of readers, this blogger’s argument would appear to make a lot of sense, and probably turn some shoppers off from buying the more expensive organic label in their produce section. For the average person who doesn’t know how to ask the right questions, the idea of organic foods having health benefits just became a myth.

It’s comparable to how I feel when confronted with something about the economy. Well that feeling for me actually equates to a paralyzing fear that creeps up and extinguishes any fantasy of once being an informed citizen. To sum up, I know nothing. Shockingly little. And so, conversations of debt ceilings and bailouts and depressed economies involve a lot of head nodding on my part and a lot of explaining and mentoring on the other. For this reason, my knowledge and opinions of the economy are at the mercy of those whose whim inspires them to write about it. If you wrote an expose on the benefits of comparing the economic downturn to a puppy dog I would probably consider it high-brow academia. (But hopefully not.)

How do you reconcile political interest or, at least, a sense of political obligation with a want to accomplish your goals and create personal success even in the face of potential national success? For some it’s the inability to ask the right questions. For some, the struggle to compose a political identity.

My final point is this: How are we, the uninformed citizen, and all of us who will never be professors of political science, supposed to filter through the endless array of literature on a subject we probably don’t understand very well? If you’re not a seasoned politician is it possible to figure out what the right questions are and how to ask them? The most difficult part of preparing for an election, or just keeping up to date with pressing political news, is finding the time to do so. President Clinton, you used my time well.

Comments Off on a speech to remember

The Dish Is (kind of) Like Political Facebook


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
Let’s get one thing straight: Sullivan’s smart and he knows it. His brief bursts of political pith are equal parts entertainment and information; I feel like I’m looking at a very politically minded friend’s Facebook page.
Sullivan likes to “live blog” at political events, writing a time-stamped post about every twenty minutes (a sort of Twitter-like status update).
It’s a great approach that allows readers to get a sort of play-by-play insight from a knowledgeable source.
Still, something about it feels kind of like that guy sitting next to you in the movie theater that freaks out every time Nolan throws another plot twist in Inception­ (shocker!).
Sullivan is also a huge fan of using his posts as a sort of vignette for quotes, videos, and pictures from other Internet sources. He likes to include various charts or graphs, letting someone else run the numbers and then guiding readers to the facts that they might not have found on their own – journalism at its core.
Sullivan gives himself street cred by showing that he’s in the know, keeping tabs on other writers, political commentators, and every politician at every conference.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
As for “A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy,”

All of this, 

Sincerely,
Someone with absolutely no credibility or weight to her words on the blogging world.
Emma 
Posted in blog critiques, Politics | Comments Off on The Dish Is (kind of) Like Political Facebook

The Dish Is (kind of) Like Political Facebook


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
Let’s get one thing straight: Sullivan’s smart and he knows it. His brief bursts of political pith are equal parts entertainment and information; I feel like I’m looking at a very politically minded friend’s Facebook page.
Sullivan likes to “live blog” at political events, writing a time-stamped post about every twenty minutes (a sort of Twitter-like status update).
It’s a great approach that allows readers to get a sort of play-by-play insight from a knowledgeable source.
Still, something about it feels kind of like that guy sitting next to you in the movie theater that freaks out every time Nolan throws another plot twist in Inception­ (shocker!).
Sullivan is also a huge fan of using his posts as a sort of vignette for quotes, videos, and pictures from other Internet sources. He likes to include various charts or graphs, letting someone else run the numbers and then guiding readers to the facts that they might not have found on their own – journalism at its core.
Sullivan gives himself street cred by showing that he’s in the know, keeping tabs on other writers, political commentators, and every politician at every conference.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
As for “A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy,”

All of this, 

Sincerely,
Someone with absolutely no credibility or weight to her words on the blogging world.
Emma 
Posted in blog critiques, Politics | Comments Off on The Dish Is (kind of) Like Political Facebook

Howard Fineman Writes (kind of) Like a Senator After Happy Hour


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
Like a seasoned senator, Fineman has a wonderful sense of the workings of the political world. He trades in the finesse of political banter for vivacious wit. Fineman gets straight to the point of what he feels you need to know in each situation or with each politician. (…So more like a senator a long day and a few Scotches later)
He’ll compare Obama to Moses, paint a picture of the First Lady grooving to Stevie Wonder, and call out lazy, self-indulgent political mongers.
As a college kid, I’ll tell you that his titles could use some work. But maybe that’s how he draws in a different demographic of his readers; you know, the more politically linguistic, older folks?
It seems that Huffington Post drinks their own blogging how-to Kool Aid. Fineman exemplifies the passion, pith, and professionalism that The Huffington Post Complete Guide to Blogging encourages bloggers to embrace.
Posted in blog critiques, Politics | Comments Off on Howard Fineman Writes (kind of) Like a Senator After Happy Hour

Howard Fineman Writes (kind of) Like a Senator After Happy Hour


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
Like a seasoned senator, Fineman has a wonderful sense of the workings of the political world. He trades in the finesse of political banter for vivacious wit. Fineman gets straight to the point of what he feels you need to know in each situation or with each politician. (…So more like a senator a long day and a few Scotches later)
He’ll compare Obama to Moses, paint a picture of the First Lady grooving to Stevie Wonder, and call out lazy, self-indulgent political mongers.
As a college kid, I’ll tell you that his titles could use some work. But maybe that’s how he draws in a different demographic of his readers; you know, the more politically linguistic, older folks?
It seems that Huffington Post drinks their own blogging how-to Kool Aid. Fineman exemplifies the passion, pith, and professionalism that The Huffington Post Complete Guide to Blogging encourages bloggers to embrace.
Posted in blog critiques, Politics | Comments Off on Howard Fineman Writes (kind of) Like a Senator After Happy Hour

Well Is (kind of) Like Gossip Girl Meets Web MD

“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”

Well, well. Imagine you’re going for a jog with a friend. The conversation casually takes a turn from that outfit you wore to the party last week to how frustrated you were with how unusually tight it felt.
Now, if you’re friend has been reading Well, be prepared for any variety of latest studies on organic foods, the negative effects of that inhaler you’ve been using your whole life, or the fitness program you should try.
None of these things alone is necessarily frustrating or even bad news. It’s the combination of urgency and wishy-washiness that overwhelms readers of NY Times wellness blog.
Don’t get me wrong. Health is hugely important and a diabetes-ridden country like America certainly needs all of the help it can get. But certainly there is a better approach to spreading the news about important health facts than creating a scare with shocking finds and then leaving the reader without any hope.
Well should provide their readers with more practical health tips and information that is, additionally instead of initially, tied to studies and proven research.
For now, I feel like I’ve just heard the latest gossip, even from an eyewitness, but have been given no way to help the situation.
Posted in blog critiques, health | Comments Off on Well Is (kind of) Like Gossip Girl Meets Web MD

Gizmodo Is (kind of) Like a Sassy Teenager


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
The conversation switches from ice cream to the new iPhone to Jerry Seinfeld in a matter of minutes.  Welcome the sassy teenager of the tech world. Gizmodo is primarily a source for tech-minded individuals to get the latest on the good, the bad, and the pixelated.
Though I myself fall into the “technologically challenged” category, I am still entertained by new inventions, prototype products, and disgruntled consumer rants. I am sure, however, that there are many people who are absolutely thrilled to discuss the latest thing-a-ma-bob that fixes that computer whatsitcalled.
Gizmodo is fabulously tailored to its audience but is also an inviting place for a concerned consumer doing some basic tech research.  So though, in metaphoric terms, you might be glad not to spend a whole lot of time with that annoying neighbor kid and their loud techno toys, it’s sure nice to know that they can fix your WiFi for you.
Posted in blog critiques, tech | Comments Off on Gizmodo Is (kind of) Like a Sassy Teenager

Gizmodo Is (kind of) Like a Sassy Teenager


“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”
The conversation switches from ice cream to the new iPhone to Jerry Seinfeld in a matter of minutes.  Welcome the sassy teenager of the tech world. Gizmodo is primarily a source for tech-minded individuals to get the latest on the good, the bad, and the pixelated.
Though I myself fall into the “technologically challenged” category, I am still entertained by new inventions, prototype products, and disgruntled consumer rants. I am sure, however, that there are many people who are absolutely thrilled to discuss the latest thing-a-ma-bob that fixes that computer whatsitcalled.
Gizmodo is fabulously tailored to its audience but is also an inviting place for a concerned consumer doing some basic tech research.  So though, in metaphoric terms, you might be glad not to spend a whole lot of time with that annoying neighbor kid and their loud techno toys, it’s sure nice to know that they can fix your WiFi for you.
Posted in blog critiques, tech | Comments Off on Gizmodo Is (kind of) Like a Sassy Teenager

Well Is (kind of) Like Gossip Girl Meets Web MD

“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”

Well, well. Imagine you’re going for a jog with a friend. The conversation casually takes a turn from that outfit you wore to the party last week to how frustrated you were with how unusually tight it felt.
Now, if you’re friend has been reading Well, be prepared for any variety of latest studies on organic foods, the negative effects of that inhaler you’ve been using your whole life, or the fitness program you should try.
None of these things alone is necessarily frustrating or even bad news. It’s the combination of urgency and wishy-washiness that overwhelms readers of NY Times wellness blog.
Don’t get me wrong. Health is hugely important and a diabetes-ridden country like America certainly needs all of the help it can get. But certainly there is a better approach to spreading the news about important health facts than creating a scare with shocking finds and then leaving the reader without any hope.
Well should provide their readers with more practical health tips and information that is, additionally instead of initially, tied to studies and proven research.
For now, I feel like I’ve just heard the latest gossip, even from an eyewitness, but have been given no way to help the situation.
Posted in blog critiques, health | Comments Off on Well Is (kind of) Like Gossip Girl Meets Web MD

David Roberts’ Blogging Is (kind of) Like Global Warming

“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”

Roberts’ blog is like global climate change – slow and without known cause. Sure, it’s vital to be aware of the current state of environmental issues. It would make sense that Roberts’ true passion would be to spread a sense of urgency about the need to take care of our planet to the Internet-using population. However, Roberts takes a slow, formal, bogged down approach to writing, masking any passion that he may once have had.
Dear David Roberts,
Anyone with four dollars and a mild interest in blogging can purchase The Huffington Post Complete Guide to Blogging. I suggest that you do just that. And please please read the bold sentences on pages 84 and 91: “Rule #7: Write Short” (you, sir, write very much not short) and “Rule #3: Write Like You Speak” (I sincerely hope for all those around you that you do not actually speak like you write). That is all.

Posted in blog critiques, environment | Comments Off on David Roberts’ Blogging Is (kind of) Like Global Warming

David Roberts’ Blogging Is (kind of) Like Global Warming

“A Series of Blog Critiques: the Good, the Bad, and the Bloggy”

Roberts’ blog is like global climate change – slow and without known cause. Sure, it’s vital to be aware of the current state of environmental issues. It would make sense that Roberts’ true passion would be to spread a sense of urgency about the need to take care of our planet to the Internet-using population. However, Roberts takes a slow, formal, bogged down approach to writing, masking any passion that he may once have had.
Dear David Roberts,
Anyone with four dollars and a mild interest in blogging can purchase The Huffington Post Complete Guide to Blogging. I suggest that you do just that. And please please read the bold sentences on pages 84 and 91: “Rule #7: Write Short” (you, sir, write very much not short) and “Rule #3: Write Like You Speak” (I sincerely hope for all those around you that you do not actually speak like you write). That is all.

Posted in blog critiques, environment | Comments Off on David Roberts’ Blogging Is (kind of) Like Global Warming

Blogging ’bout Blogs

The first step to master the art of blogging is reading blogs. As a class, we selected five widely read blogs to see how this unique niche authors achieved blogosphere domination. The blogs I’ll be following cover a wide range of interests: politics, environmental issues, health and wellness, and technology. Besides Tumblr (my dashboard is mainly of a constant stream of Harry Potter, Dr. Who and cat images), I’ve never consistently read a blog. By examining these five established blog authors, I hope to learn the ins-and-outs of blogging in the real world.

With the DNC and Michelle Obama’s amazingly toned arms on everybody’s radar this week, I’ll start with Howard Fineman on the original aggregate wunderblog, The Huffington Post. Through an elegant and understated black-and-white portrait, Fineman’s thin-rimmed glasses and confident smile have already assured me that he is to be trusted. His most recent blogpost is titled “Where Are the “Over the Transom” Voters?” Seeing as I don’t know what transom means (is this an idiom?), this is as good a place as any to start learning blogo-lingo. He writes in a very straightforward, journalistic-style manner; statistics, expert quotes and direct comparisons to the 2008 election give the reader a sense of reading the news. However, unlike the news, the post’s ultimate goal is not merely to inform but also to mobilize Democratic voters to act with a sense of urgency. Where’s that “spontaneous enthusiasm” that rallied the campaign of 2008? Which reminds me, why haven’t I heard “rock the vote” in four years? As an added bonus, there’s a fun Electoral Predictor that forecasts a Democrat beatdown this November. Still don’t know what a transom is.

As predicted, Andrew Sullivan’s conservative blog on The Daily Beast called “The Dish” takes quite a different take on the DNC. Unfortunately I haven’t been keeping up with the goings-on of the party conventions, so I appreciate his play-by-play breakdown of the event. Sullivan mixes humor into his posts, such as Face of the Day Richard Trumka, which really gives the blog its flavor. In my opinion, he stays pretty balanced throughout his breakdown, generally giving credit where credit is due. For example: “What’s great about Clinton’s speech: he has taken on the opposing argument directly.” As the HuffPo Guide to Blogging recommends, Sullivan uses a chatty tone throughout; my dad calling out the play-by-play of a basketball game from the living room would sound the same way (with some Chinese sprinkled in). He summarizes the night nicely for those who aren’t politically inclined and breaks it up with some music reviews every Friday.

After these politics blogs, it’s time to move on to lighthearted topics, such as the state of emergency that our climate is in, and—what’s this? Nearly every headline on David Roberts’ blog at The Grist involves the election! I suppose this makes sense, given that our best chance for survival relies on vast structural change. Roberts writes with a very accessible tone that exudes his unique voice. Besides the political commentary, I’m particularly struck by a story about a mountaintop mining protest featuring raw, first-hand commentary from the front lines of an important issue. As an environmental activist-in-training, I have a lot to learn from this blog and am eager to read more of this journalism from the sidelines. He combines mountaintop mining research with the stories of the people, the personal with the political, ultimately refreshing an issue that has been completely ignored in the news.

I enjoy reading The New York Times’ wellness blog, Well, more for its content than style of writing. Each story is interesting and offers totally new information to me. Perhaps because of the paper’s rock-solid brand, I’m thinking of the Well stories more as “articles” than “posts”. The latest article compares conventional and organic foods. I’ve tried to become a vegetarian for years, each guilt-induced attempt spurred on by a PETA booklet passed out in the mail or a convicting viewing of Food, Inc.. But every time I’ve fallen prey to a moist, flavorful turkey leg or juicy rack of ribs smothered in barbecue sauce and falling off the bone. I know the basic health and environmental benefits that come with eating vegan, at least vegetarian and at the very least, organic. I’m fascinated by one story in particular, a glimpse into the life of a 25-year-old woman during the one week a month that she receives chemotherapy treatment for leukemia. From what I can tell, she isn’t afraid to include even seemingly unimportant details about these days, and it really pays off in her credibility as the storyteller as well as its intrigue.

Lastly, Gizmodo’s blog focuses on the latest technology from around the world. I’m not big on technology current events, but I still appreciate the blog for its comprehensive scope. Today it highlights the failure of Nokia to fully realize the potential of its iPhone alternative, the Lumia 920. Many of the articles on Gizmodo are tailored to the reader—“the first thing you notice about the Lumia 920…but then you notice the rest of it…” which makes me feel like part of the conversation. Interestingly, rather than the typical comment-by-comment format, Gizmodo arranges comments into two columns, giving it the appearance of a newspaper rather than an online forum.

I look forward to staying tuned to these blogs. I already feel more informed about the election, became suspicious of organic food, and even got the chance to diagnose a patient whose skin was slowly turning blue. I’ll let you know which blog becomes my favorite in the near future. Until then, there’s a lot of Gizmodo to read.

Signing out,

Sums

P.S. “Over the transom” refers to the nautical term for the back of a small boat. Something which “came in over the transom” would have suddenly (and presumably, surprisingly) entered through the “back door” of the craft. So there you have it. But now the obvious question remains: just how willing is America to surprise Obama in the back of his nautical craft? We’ll know on November 6.

i'm on a boat

Legal photo ID required to board craft

Comments Off on Blogging ’bout Blogs