This image of CERN provided by TIME was taken at the peak of the 2012 craze over the facility’s discovery of neutrino particles breaking light speed. Since the barrier of light speed has been such an insurmountable rock and cornerstone of physics, the neutrino’s clocked speed increase of 0.0025% was groundbreaking. Although I was only 12 at the time, I remember hearing rumblings about the neutrino’s beyond-light speed record, and I suspect that it had entered the sphere of pop discussions as well due to the gravity of such news.
Unfortunately (or fortunately), the neutrino particles’ unprecedented speed was the result of a loose cable in the GPS system in the CERN facility, and the neutrinos fell into a long line of illegitimate phenomenon of breaking light speed.
However, one known instance of light speed being broken is the expansion of the universe. There is a sphere known as the Hubble volume; it is not a fixed region in the universe, but it is an area around an observer within the universe where any objects beyond the Hubble volume boundaries are receding away from the observer faster than the speed of light. I’m not the most well-versed in universe expansion, but I wonder what this Hubble volume suggests about the limits of our observation of space. Assuming that there were no celestial obstacles blocking our vision of the full universe, the Hubble volume seems to suggest that there are some celestial bodies whose light will never reach us due to the region between us and the object expanding faster than light can travel; I think of it like climbing (us being the light) at a slower velocity against the trajectory of an escalator (being the universe) – this thought experiment confirms that we would never reach the top of the escalator, much in the same way that an object’s light that begins outside of the Hubble volume would never reach the observer.