Reproducibility Category

Figure 2
Illustration of minimally rater performance relative to an experienced rater for T1 data (A) and T2 data (B). The top row shows 200 slices which have been expertly labeled sorted by the median overlap with minimally trained raters. The center row shows the number of times each slice has been labeled. The final row illustrates an arbitrary example from the lowest, median, and highest accuracy slices.

Collaborative Labeling of Malignant Glioma with WebMILL: A First Look

Feb. 1, 2012—E. Singh, Z. Xu, A. Asman, L. Chambless, R. Thompson and B. Landman. “Collaborative Labeling of Malignant Glioma with WebMILL: A First Look.” In Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging Conference. San Diego, California, February 2012 † Full Text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Collaborative+Labeling+of+Malignant+Glioma+with+WebMILL%3A+A+First+Look Abstract Malignant gliomas are the most common form of primary neoplasm in the central nervous...

Figure 2
Results from the controlled rater observation simulation. The target intensity image and the corresponding true labels can be seen (A) and (B), respectively. The set of input observations used in this experiment can be seen in (C). The results of the four algorithms, Majority Vote, STAPLE, Binary-COLLATE and Multi-COLLATE can be seen in (D)–(G). Note that the 3 consensus-level implementation of Multi-COLLATE is the only algorithm that gets the correct answer. The 3 energy in each of the consensus levels can be seen in (H)–(J). Note that by distributing the non-consensus voxels into two separate levels, (H) and (I), the estimation process converges to the correct answer.

Generalized Statistical Label Fusion using Multiple Consensus Levels

Feb. 1, 2012—Z. Xu, A. Asman and B. Landman. “Generalized Statistical Label Fusion using Multiple Consensus Levels.” In Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging Conference. San Diego, California, February 2012 (Oral Presentation) PMC3438516† Full Text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%E2%80%9CGeneralized+Statistical+Label+Fusion+using+Multiple+Consensus+Levels. Abstract Segmentation plays a critical role in exposing connections between biological structure and function. The process of label fusion collects and...

A single registered slice from the baseline images in the multi-parametric study of a representative subject. Structural scans (a–c) reveal high resolution information on local tissue classification. Diffusion (d–e), quantitative T2 (f–g), magnetization transfer (h–i), and quantitative T1 (j–k) provide assessments of local micro-structure. Field maps (l–n) enable improved calibration of quantitative findings. Assessment of perfusion (o–p) allows inference on functional characteristics.

Multi-Parametric Neuroimaging Reproducibility: A 3T Resource Study

Jan. 31, 2011—Bennett A. Landman, Alan J. Huang, Aliya Gifford, Deepti S. Vikram, Issel Anne L. Lim, Jonathan A.D. Farrell, John A. Bogovic, Jun Hua, Min Chen, Samson Jarso, Seth A. Smith, Suresh Joel, Susumu Mori, James J. Pekar, Peter B. Barker, Jerry L. Prince, and Peter C.M. van Zijl. “Multi-Parametric Neuroimaging Reproducibility: A 3T Resource Study”,...