Skip to main content

Combining Multi-atlas Segmentation with Brain Surface Estimation

Posted by on Tuesday, March 1, 2016 in Image Processing, Label fusion, Multi-atlas Segmentation, Neuroimaging.

Yuankai Huo, Aaron Carass, Susan M. Resnick, Dzung L. Pham, Jerry L. Prince, Bennett A. Landman.2016 “Combining Multi-atlas Segmentation with Brain Surface Estimation,” In Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging Conference 2016. Oral presentation.

Full Text: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2506157 Pubmed

Abstract

Whole brain segmentation (with comprehensive cortical and subcortical labels) and cortical surface reconstruction are two essential techniques for investigating the human brain. The two tasks are typically conducted independently, however, which leads to spatial inconsistencies and hinders further integrated cortical analyses. To obtain self-consistent whole brain segmentations and surfaces, FreeSurfer segregates the subcortical and cortical segmentations before and after the cortical surface reconstruction. However, this “segmentation to surface to parcellation” strategy has shown limitation in various situations. In this work, we propose a novel “multi-atlas segmentation to surface” method called Multi-atlas CRUISE (MaCRUISE), which achieves self-consistent whole brain segmentations and cortical surfaces by combining multi-atlas segmentation with the cortical reconstruction method CRUISE. To our knowledge, this is the first work that achieves the reliability of state-of-the-art multi-atlas segmentation and labeling methods together with accurate and consistent cortical surface reconstruction. Compared with previous methods, MaCRUISE has three features: (1) MaCRUISE obtains 132 cortical/subcortical labels simultaneously from a single multi-atlas segmentation before reconstructing volume consistent surfaces; (2) Fuzzy tissue memberships are combined with multi-atlas segmentations to address partial volume effects; (3) MaCRUISE reconstructs topologically consistent cortical surfaces by using the sulci locations from multi-atlas segmentation. Two data sets, one consisting of five subjects with expertly traced landmarks and the other consisting of 100 volumes from elderly subjects are used for validation. Compared with CRUISE, MaCRUISE achieves self-consistent whole brain segmentation and cortical reconstruction without compromising on surface accuracy. MaCRUISE is comparably accurate to FreeSurfer while achieving greater robustness across an elderly population. © (2016) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

This figure shows the failures for seven problematic volumes. Both whole brain segmentations and cortical surfaces on axial slices are provided. The areas in red rectangles show the global failures while the areas in blue rectangles show the local failures. MaCRUISE did not exhibit such failures in any images.
This figure shows the failures for seven problematic volumes. Both whole brain segmentations and cortical surfaces on axial slices are provided. The areas in red rectangles show the global failures while the areas in blue rectangles show the local failures. MaCRUISE did not exhibit such failures in any images.